From 6cbe58797781cb8514a62bb3ab0e3e8a5d58bce2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: dzwdz
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 01:06:41 +0200
Subject: kernel: add _sys_getprocfs in place of HANDLE_PROCFS

This makes the side-effects more explicit, and feels less hacky than
`HANDLE_PROCFS`. I don't think accessing a handle alone should have
side-effects, even if it's a "special" one.
---
 src/libc/syscall.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

(limited to 'src/libc/syscall.c')

diff --git a/src/libc/syscall.c b/src/libc/syscall.c
index b920e14..706aec6 100644
--- a/src/libc/syscall.c
+++ b/src/libc/syscall.c
@@ -90,6 +90,10 @@ int _sys_wait2(int pid, int flags, struct sys_wait2 __user *out) {
 	return (int)_syscall(_SYS_WAIT2, (long)pid, (long)flags, (long)out, 0, 0);
 }
 
+hid_t _sys_getprocfs(int flags) {
+	return (hid_t)_syscall(_SYS_GETPROCFS, (long)flags, 0, 0, 0, 0);
+}
+
 long _sys_execbuf(void __user *buf, size_t len) {
 	return _syscall(_SYS_EXECBUF, (long)buf, (long)len, 0, 0, 0);
 }
-- 
cgit v1.2.3