From 6cbe58797781cb8514a62bb3ab0e3e8a5d58bce2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: dzwdz
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 01:06:41 +0200
Subject: kernel: add _sys_getprocfs in place of HANDLE_PROCFS

This makes the side-effects more explicit, and feels less hacky than
`HANDLE_PROCFS`. I don't think accessing a handle alone should have
side-effects, even if it's a "special" one.
---
 src/bootstrap/main.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

(limited to 'src/bootstrap/main.c')

diff --git a/src/bootstrap/main.c b/src/bootstrap/main.c
index d27da39..27c5fad 100644
--- a/src/bootstrap/main.c
+++ b/src/bootstrap/main.c
@@ -1,10 +1,11 @@
 #include <_proc.h>
+#include <camellia.h>
 #include <camellia/flags.h>
+#include <camellia/fs/misc.h>
 #include <camellia/syscalls.h>
+#include <elfload.h>
 #include <stdio.h>
 #include <string.h>
-#include <elfload.h>
-#include <camellia/fs/misc.h>
 
 #include "tar.h"
 
@@ -17,7 +18,7 @@ int main(void) {
 	_sys_memflag(_psdata_loc, 1, MEMFLAG_PRESENT);
 	setprogname("bootstrap");
 
-	_sys_mount(HANDLE_PROCFS, "/proc/", strlen("/proc/"));
+	camellia_procfs("/proc/");
 	MOUNT_AT("/") {
 		fs_dirinject2((const char*[]) {
 			"/proc/",
-- 
cgit v1.2.3