Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | |
---|---|---|---|
2024-07-26 | kernel: implement _sys_intr_return | dzwdz | |
2024-07-20 | *: moving files | dzwdz | |
2023-12-25 | kernel: _sys_getnull() (basically /dev/null) | dzwdz | |
2023-09-25 | kernel: remove _sys_filicide (made redundant by _sys_intr) | dzwdz | |
2023-09-25 | kernel/intr: accept a message, allow killing processes via intrs | dzwdz | |
2023-09-18 | kernel: implement _sys_time() | dzwdz | |
After some consideration this seems like the most fitting way to handle timekeeping. Directly, the syscall is only useful for keeping time within a single process, but it is meant to be used for e.g. NTP clients, which will provide the real time through the VFS. | |||
2023-08-31 | kernel: add _sys_getprocfs in place of HANDLE_PROCFS | dzwdz | |
This makes the side-effects more explicit, and feels less hacky than `HANDLE_PROCFS`. I don't think accessing a handle alone should have side-effects, even if it's a "special" one. | |||
2023-08-29 | kernel: remove _sys_await, emulate it in libc | dzwdz | |
2023-08-14 | reorganization: first steps | dzwdz | |