Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This isn't really all that useful, it doesn't enable anything that
wasn't possible before. With it removed I'll be able to implement
process_exit() in a much simpler way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
the new name is terrible, but at least the function now has a clear
purpose
|
|
|
|
|
|
thanks to this i can tell which ones are placeholders, and which ones
should stay
|
|
|
|
|
|
yay for pointless changes
|
|
whoops
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i think that making the call a bit more "transparent" makes the code
nicer
|
|
|
|
|
|
thanks to this, the fs provider can continue executing until the next
fs_wait() call. that should speed things up a bit
|
|
|
|
|
|
awaited_req is a garbage name but i couldn't come up with a better one.
i also have no idea how to handle all the failure states
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
this was already possible, but now it's slightly safer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
this will be needed for storing vfs_op's properly
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|